Julia Banks resigned from the Liberal Party. The Liberal Party is better off without her.
Possibly the biggest problem the Liberal Party has is that it is infested by the loony left. This is making it very hard for the party to present a united front. It is making it hard for the party to develop policy. And it is making it hard for the party to develop and conduct an effective marketing strategy.
What is more, it is also making it difficult for the Liberal Party to defend freedom, democracy, free enterprise and that sort of stuff. Which is rather important.
So, it is good news whenever the Liberal Party loses anyone who tends to the left.
They got rid of Malcolm Turnbull, which was a big win. He was clearly driving the party towards leftist globalist agendas. This was leading to division in the party and was causing serious problems with brand differentiation.
And now Julia Banks is gone.
And it would seem she also had leftist tendencies. We only have to listen to the language she used when quitting, talking about the “reactionary right wing”. There’s some hard lefty loony talk. Which gives us some clues as to where her real loyalties lie.
But why was she in the Liberal Party in the first place if she had a love for the hard left? And why did the party let her in? If that is where her heart is then she would be much happier out of the Liberal Party.
However, if Julia Banks goes down the path of supporting the hard left does she really know what she would be getting involved with? Does she really understand the globalist authoritarian agendas of the hard left?
The good news for the Liberal Party with both Malcolm Turnbull and Julia Banks gone is that it now has that much better chance of getting its house in order. It now has that much better chance of getting some decent policies and developing some decent marketing.
But it has to take the opportunity.
Michael J. Thompson
